<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PatternExon &#187; urban planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patternexon.com/tag/urban-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patternexon.com</link>
	<description>is an anagram of Not An Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 03:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Charter Cities &#8211; Paul Romer</title>
		<link>http://www.patternexon.com/charter-cities-paul-romer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patternexon.com/charter-cities-paul-romer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>akshat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TED Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[squatter cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patternexon.com/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is an interesting talk by Paul Romer and there are a few things that I do agree  &#8211; building cities is profitable and environment-friendly and political leaders should decide to usher changes slowly and smartly. A change that shakes the entire nation is a revolution &#8211; and to prosper without harming others during a political revolution [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="446" height="326" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/embed/PaulRomer_2009G-embed_high.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/PaulRomer-2009G.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=608" /><param name="src" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="446" height="326" src="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" wmode="transparent" bgcolor="#ffffff" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/embed/PaulRomer_2009G-embed_high.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/PaulRomer-2009G.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=608"></embed></object></p>
<p>This is an interesting talk by <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/~promer/" target="_blank">Paul Romer</a> and there are a few things that I do agree  &#8211; building cities is profitable and environment-friendly and political leaders should decide to usher changes slowly and smartly. A change that shakes the entire nation is a revolution &#8211; and to prosper without harming others during a political revolution is extremely difficult. Revolutions breed anti-revolutions and counter-revolutions. There is no denying that Hong Kong became <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/46/Pauliyas_Hongkong.jpg" target="_blank">Hong Kong</a> because it was a singularly odd setup. I don&#8217;t agree that Hong Kong was safe or crime-free. One of the primary reasons that HKG turned into a thriving city was the true capitalist nature of all enterprises - public or private; including police, customs and immigration. The SEZs did not have that independence, ever. Even at shenzhen, the initial movement of labour was highly restricted. </p>
<p>The world map at night is an visually appealing barometer of prosperity, but I think putting all the world in darkness at the same time stops one from imagining great economic potential(call centres).</p>
<p>Writing up a charter is a good place to start. Footnotes like &#8220;Glasnost without Perestroika&#8221; would help political leaders from not falling into international calamities.  But I disagree with working as countries to build new cities that would be new centres of prosperity. Maybe think of a township authority working with international companies. A top-down mega-project of development could be disastrous and only such projects need &#8216;to make room for people to be left behind&#8217;.</p>
<p>Why not work closely with squatter cities ? Leverage the innovation and entrepreneurship that&#8217;s one face of every squatter community. The unemployed or unemployed who  have migrated to cities are exactly the labour force that are needed by such charter cities. So instead a charter for creation of the huge city with a swarm of industries granting a special legal and administrative rights to squatters and inviting corporations using instruments like tax-breaks and cheaper resources to build out the squatter city into a satellite city with better sanitation, health care and education may be a viral idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patternexon.com/charter-cities-paul-romer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
